Charisma and Causality

What if art were a kind of magic? One of the thinkers associated with ‘object-oriented ontology’ argues that we’ve been thinking wrongly about art since the beginning of the Anthropocene, from the November issue

By Timothy Morton

Chris Wainwright, Red Ice (Dislocated Bay, Greenland), 2009, c-type print. Courtesy the artist Rothko Chapel, Houston, Texas. Photo: Hickey-Robertson. Kirsten Dunst in Melancholia, 2011, dir Lars von Trier. Courtesy Zentropa

For object-oriented ontology (OOO), art is far from a superficial and exclusively human-flavoured region of reality. Whatever human art is, it is telling us something very deep about the structure of how things are: ‘the structure of how things are’ being a pretty good paraphrase of the word ‘ontology’. Indeed, one of the things that art is telling us – that we still allow it (as opposed to what we expect from science textbooks, for instance) to tell us, perhaps…

Want to read more?

As an unregistered user you can view 5 articles per month.

You can register free to get a further 15 free articles

and access to 2 digital editions per month

or subscribe for unlimited access

If you have already signed up access you account here