Not so long ago, deeming a work of art ‘derivative’ meant it was unoriginal, that its moves were too easily recognised in other, more significant work, often by older, more established artists. It was an easy putdown, and a defensive one too. Dissing something as ‘derivative’ was rarely followed by the question, ‘Of what?’ If you had to ask, then you were exposing your own lack of knowledge of the field. Best to nod the head and offer your coerced…
Want to read more?
As an unregistered user you can view 5 articles per month.
You can register free to get a further 15 free articles
and access to 2 digital editions per month
or subscribe for unlimited access
If you have already signed up access you account here